Before beginning recess in early August, the U.S. House of Representatives managed to pass a new energy bill, but unlike the Senate refrained from including new fuel economy standards in it. House Energy Committee leader John Dingell (D-MI) has stated his plans to include fuel economy increases as part of an economy-wide climate change package expected to be introduced this fall. Other House leaders are pushing for fuel economy rules to be included in an energy bill conference with the Senate, which included new 35mpg standards in its version of the energy legislation.
Meanwhile, fuel economy proposals that were introduced in the House continue to gain support. Automakers and the UAW continue to fight for the Hill-Terry bill, which has less aggressive fuel economy targets and includes an "antibacksliding" provision that helps ensure that small car production remains in the U.S.
The other leading proposal, introduced by Markey-Platts, requires stiffer fuel economy increases similar to the Senate, but offers limited tools to help the domestic companies achieve the standards. Neither proposal contains significant incentives to domestic automakers for retooling their factories to produce new fuel efficient vehicles and technologies.
Whichever path Congress decides to take, a combination of strong standards, job protections and generous incentives for retooling would provide the best opportunities for saving both oil and jobs.
Read more:
|